Emotional regulation isn't suppression. It's trust.
- Joshua Ericson

- May 19
- 1 min read
I used to think staying calm meant I was doing well. Like if I could keep my voice steady and my face neutral, I was winning at emotional regulation.
What I was actually doing was dissociating with flair.
See, I didn’t grow up in an environment where emotional expression felt safe. I learned to monitor other people’s moods, stay small, and keep everything inside. I thought being in control meant not reacting. Not needing. Not feeling.
So when I started learning emotional regulation in therapy, I thought, "Cool—I already do that!"
Except I didn’t. I wasn’t regulating. I was suppressing.
Regulation isn’t about pretending you're fine. It’s not about staying silent when something hurts or putting on a smile so no one asks questions. That’s just emotional masking with extra steps.
Real regulation means trusting your emotions enough to feel them without fear. It means building enough safety in your body and your relationships to stay present while that feeling moves through.
It means noticing you're angry without becoming destructive. Noticing you're anxious without spiraling. Noticing you're overwhelmed—and choosing to pause instead of lash out.
Regulation is a pause. Not a shutdown.
It’s the part where you take a breath before responding—not to perform control, but to connect with what’s real. To honor your experience instead of denying it.
And yeah, it’s hard. Especially if your nervous system is used to going from 0 to 100 or disappearing altogether.
But the goal of emotional regulation isn’t to become emotionless. It’s to become safe with yourself.
That’s not weakness. That’s strength.
And I’m still learning it. Every day.




Comments